Browse Categories

Plays
Being: An unhistorical pastoral: A romantic farce: Bruce, a chronicle play: Smith, a tragic farce: and Scaramouch in Naxos, a pantomime. Book Cover

Plays Being: An unhistorical pastoral: A romantic farce: Bruce, a chronicle play: Smith, a tragic farce: and Scaramouch in Naxos, a pantomime. Book Summary

This collection, titled *Plays: Being: An unhistorical pastoral: A romantic farce: Bruce, a chronicle play: Smith, a tragic farce: and Scaramouch in Naxos, a pantomime* by John Davidson, is a fascinating, if somewhat obscure, foray into late 19th-century dramatic experimentation. Davidson, a Scottish poet and playwright, wasn't aiming for mainstream success with these works. Instead, he deliberately challenged conventional theatrical forms, creating pieces that are often more philosophical and poetic than traditionally 'playable'. Expect a lot of dialogue and a focus on ideas rather than straightforward plot.
The book contains five distinct plays, each a deliberate attempt to subvert a specific genre. *Being: An unhistorical pastoral* is a philosophical dialogue exploring existence. *A Romantic Farce* is a lighthearted, yet intellectually stimulating, take on romantic tropes. *Bruce* is a chronicle play, loosely based on Robert the Bruce, but more concerned with the nature of history and heroism than historical accuracy. *Smith* is a 'tragic farce,' a deliberately unsettling blend of the tragic and the comedic. Finally, *Scaramouch in Naxos* is a pantomime, a highly visual and physical form of theatre. Collectively, the plays represent Davidson's rejection of realism and his search for a more symbolic and poetic form of drama.

One of the most striking aspects of Davidson's work is his deconstruction of genre. He doesn't simply *write* a farce or a tragedy; he actively questions what those genres mean and what their limitations are. *Smith*, the tragic farce, is a prime example. By blending the expected emotional responses of tragedy with the absurdity of farce, Davidson forces the audience to confront the uncomfortable truth that life often *is* a mixture of both. It's a commentary on the futility of trying to neatly categorize human experience.

The plays also grapple with the nature of history and identity. *Bruce*, while nominally about the Scottish king, is less interested in recounting historical events and more focused on exploring the myth-making process. Davidson seems to suggest that history isn't a fixed set of facts, but rather a collection of stories we tell ourselves, often shaped by our present-day concerns. This idea resonates strongly with postmodern historical analysis.

A recurring theme is the search for meaning in a seemingly meaningless world. *Being: An unhistorical pastoral* is almost entirely composed of philosophical debate, with characters questioning their own existence and the nature of reality. This isn't presented as a depressing nihilism, but rather as a necessary step towards creating one's own values and finding purpose. The play encourages a critical examination of accepted beliefs.

Finally, Davidson's work highlights the power of language and its ability to both reveal and conceal truth. His dialogue is often highly stylized and poetic, drawing attention to the form of the words themselves. He uses language not just to convey information, but to create atmosphere, explore ideas, and challenge the audience's perceptions. This emphasis on language anticipates many of the concerns of modernist literature.

  • You enjoy experimental theatre and are open to unconventional dramatic structures.
  • You're interested in philosophical ideas and don't mind plays that prioritize dialogue and concepts over action.
  • You appreciate poetic language and are willing to engage with challenging texts.
  • You have an interest in late 19th-century literature and the precursors to modernism.
  • You are a student of theatre history or dramatic literature.
Yes, absolutely. Davidson's questioning of genre, his exploration of historical narrative, and his focus on existential themes remain remarkably relevant. His work anticipates many of the key concerns of 20th and 21st-century drama, and his willingness to experiment with form continues to inspire playwrights today. The deconstruction of traditional storytelling and the blending of tones are common techniques in contemporary theatre, and Davidson was a pioneer in this regard.
Reading on Gutenburg Free reading
Get Paperback Version on Amazon Buy a book
Suggest Book : Waiting for Godot Book Get on Amazon
John Davidson's *Plays* is a challenging but rewarding read. It's not a collection of crowd-pleasing entertainment, but rather a series of thought-provoking experiments that offer a unique glimpse into the mind of a restless and innovative artist. While perhaps not widely known, his work deserves to be rediscovered by anyone interested in the evolution of modern drama.
Tags : Literature